Latest News and Info

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Atopic Dermatitis and Chronic Urticaria: Why They Matter in Modern Allergy Care

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Atopic Dermatitis and Chronic Urticaria: Why They Matter in Modern Allergy Care

The management of chronic allergic skin conditions is evolving rapidly. Increasingly, healthcare professionals recognise that understanding how patients feel and function in daily life is just as important as measuring clinical signs and laboratory results. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are helping bridge this gap by bringing the patient’s voice directly into clinical decision-making.

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in atopic dermatitis and chronic urticaria, highlighting findings from the international UCARE ADCARE PROMUSE study and the role of patient-centred allergy care.

Patient-reported outcome measures help clinicians understand symptom burden, quality of life and treatment response in atopic dermatitis and chronic urticaria

What Are Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)?

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are validated questionnaires completed by patients that assess symptoms, quality of life, treatment effectiveness and the overall impact of disease on everyday activities.

Unlike laboratory tests or physical examinations, PROMs capture the aspects of disease that only patients can truly describe. This is particularly important in conditions such as atopic dermatitis (eczema) and chronic urticaria (hives), where symptom severity, itching, sleep disruption and emotional wellbeing may fluctuate significantly between clinic visits.

PROMs help clinicians better understand the burden of disease, monitor treatment response and support shared decision-making between patients and healthcare professionals.

The PROMUSE Study: Understanding Why PROMs Are Underused

A landmark international study published in the World Allergy Organization Journal in 2026 investigated why PROMs remain underused in routine clinical practice despite their recognised value.

The PROMUSE study was conducted through the international UCARE (Urticaria Centres of Reference and Excellence) and ADCARE (Atopic Dermatitis Centres of Reference and Excellence) networks and involved physicians from specialised allergy and dermatology centres worldwide.

Importantly, Professor Michael Rudenko of the London Allergy and Immunology Centre was among the international co-authors contributing to this global collaboration examining the implementation of patient-centred outcome measures in allergic skin disease.

Key Findings

  • Many clinicians recognise the value of PROMs but face practical barriers to implementation.
  • Time constraints remain the most commonly reported challenge.
  • Many physicians believe patients dislike completing questionnaires.
  • Lack of integration into electronic health systems limits routine use.
  • Some clinicians feel PROMs may interfere with the doctor-patient relationship.
  • The greater the number of perceived barriers, the less likely physicians are to use PROMs regularly.

Interestingly, the study found that concerns regarding patient dissatisfaction and interference with clinical interactions were among the strongest factors associated with reduced PROM use.

Professor Michael Rudenko’s Clinical Perspective

As both a co-author of the PROMUSE study and a practising Consultant Allergist and Clinical Immunologist, I believe the findings highlight an important opportunity to improve patient-centred care in allergy and dermatology.

In everyday clinical practice, many patients experience symptoms that cannot be fully appreciated through examination alone. A patient with chronic urticaria may have minimal visible hives during a consultation but may have experienced severe symptoms throughout the preceding week. Similarly, a patient with atopic dermatitis may appear clinically improved while still suffering from significant itching, sleep disruption and reduced quality of life.

PROMs provide a structured way to capture these experiences and ensure they become part of the clinical conversation.

Importantly, PROMs should never replace clinical judgement or specialist assessment. Rather, they should complement traditional medical evaluation by helping clinicians understand the patient’s perspective more accurately.

The most effective PROMs are simple, relevant and easy to complete. They should focus on outcomes that matter most to patients while providing meaningful information that can guide treatment decisions.

Modern medicine is increasingly moving towards personalised and precision healthcare. In this context, understanding how a disease affects an individual’s daily life is becoming just as important as measuring objective disease activity.

Future developments are likely to include digital symptom tracking, integration with electronic health records, mobile health applications and more sophisticated patient-centred outcome measures developed with direct patient involvement.

Ultimately, successful allergy care requires both scientific expertise and a clear understanding of the patient’s lived experience. PROMs can help bridge that gap and support better outcomes for patients with chronic allergic diseases.

Professor Michael Rudenko MD PhD FAAAAI
Consultant Allergist and Clinical Immunologist
London Allergy and Immunology Centre

PROMs in Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis affects millions of people worldwide and often causes substantial physical and psychological burden. Symptoms such as itching, sleep disturbance, skin pain, embarrassment and reduced self-confidence may significantly impact daily life.

PROMs help clinicians understand:

  • Severity of itching
  • Sleep quality
  • Impact on work and school performance
  • Emotional wellbeing
  • Treatment satisfaction
  • Long-term disease control

By incorporating patient-reported outcomes into routine care, clinicians can gain a more complete picture of disease burden and treatment effectiveness.

PROMs in Chronic Urticaria

Chronic urticaria is characterised by recurrent hives, swelling (angioedema) or both. Symptoms may fluctuate unpredictably and can have a major impact on quality of life.

Patient-reported outcome measures are particularly useful for:

  • Assessing symptom control over time
  • Evaluating treatment effectiveness
  • Monitoring disease activity between visits
  • Supporting treatment optimisation
  • Identifying patients who require escalation of therapy

Several validated urticaria-specific questionnaires are now widely used in clinical research and specialist practice.

The Future of Patient-Centred Allergy Care

The future of allergy and dermatology care will increasingly focus on combining clinical expertise with patient-reported outcomes, digital health technologies and shared decision-making.

The PROMUSE study suggests that while barriers remain, clinicians and healthcare systems have an opportunity to redesign PROM implementation in a way that is both efficient and meaningful for patients.

Importantly, future PROM development should involve patients directly, ensuring that questionnaires reflect the outcomes that matter most to those living with allergic disease.

When Should You See an Allergy Specialist?

You may benefit from specialist assessment if you experience:

  • Persistent eczema despite treatment
  • Chronic hives lasting longer than six weeks
  • Recurrent angioedema
  • Sleep disturbance caused by skin symptoms
  • Reduced quality of life due to allergic disease
  • Uncertainty regarding diagnosis or treatment options

A specialist allergy assessment can help establish an accurate diagnosis, optimise treatment and identify factors contributing to persistent symptoms.

References

Cherrez-Ojeda I, Robles-Velasco K, Giménez-Arnau A, et al. Why physicians underuse patient-reported outcomes in atopic dermatitis and chronic urticaria: Insights from the UCARE/ADCARE PROMUSE study. World Allergy Organization Journal. 2026;19:101398.

Additional references available upon request.

FcRn Blockade and IgG Autoantibodies | Immunology Treatment Explained

Patient Immunology Information

FcRn Blockade and IgG Autoantibodies

A medical explanation of how the neonatal Fc receptor helps IgG antibodies survive in the body, and how FcRn blockade may reduce disease-causing IgG autoantibodies in selected antibody-mediated autoimmune conditions.

Key message

FcRn blockade is a targeted immunological treatment strategy designed to lower immunoglobulin G, known as IgG. It interrupts the recycling system that normally protects IgG from breakdown. In conditions where IgG autoantibodies contribute to inflammation, receptor dysfunction or tissue injury, reducing circulating IgG may help reduce disease activity without broadly suppressing the whole immune system.

Immunology of FcRn-mediated IgG recycling and FcRn blockade, showing antibody recycling under normal conditions and accelerated degradation of pathogenic IgG autoantibodies after FcRn inhibition.

Immunology illustration demonstrating the role of the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) in IgG recycling and how FcRn blockade promotes degradation of pathogenic IgG autoantibodies in antibody-mediated autoimmune disease.

What is FcRn?

FcRn stands for neonatal Fc receptor. Despite the word neonatal, FcRn is not only important in newborn babies. It remains active throughout life and is found in several tissues, including vascular endothelial cells, immune cells and epithelial surfaces. Its main role is to regulate the survival of IgG antibodies and albumin in the circulation.

IgG is the most abundant antibody class in the blood. It plays an essential role in protection against infection, long-term immune memory and the response to vaccination. However, in some autoimmune diseases, the immune system produces IgG autoantibodies. These are antibodies that bind to the body’s own proteins. If these IgG autoantibodies are pathogenic, they may activate inflammatory pathways, interfere with normal receptor function, recruit complement, promote tissue injury or disturb normal cell signalling.

How FcRn protects IgG from breakdown

Cells constantly take up small amounts of fluid and proteins from the bloodstream. Many internalised proteins are sent to lysosomes, where they are broken down. IgG is different because FcRn binds to IgG inside acidic endosomes and diverts it away from lysosomal degradation. The IgG is then recycled back to the cell surface and released into the bloodstream.

This recycling process gives IgG a long biological half-life compared with many other circulating proteins. In healthy immunity, this is useful because protective antibodies remain available for longer. In antibody-mediated autoimmunity, the same protective recycling pathway may also prolong the survival of harmful IgG autoantibodies.

The FcRn recycling pathway in simple terms

1. IgG enters cells from the bloodstream.

2. FcRn binds IgG inside acidic endosomes.

3. Bound IgG is protected from lysosomal breakdown.

4. IgG is returned to the bloodstream.

5. This prolongs IgG survival, including the survival of pathogenic IgG autoantibodies.

What is FcRn blockade?

FcRn blockade means using a medicine that prevents FcRn from rescuing IgG. When IgG can no longer bind effectively to FcRn, more IgG is directed towards lysosomal degradation. This leads to a reduction in total circulating IgG, including pathogenic IgG autoantibodies.

This approach is different from many traditional immunosuppressive treatments. FcRn blockade does not aim to shut down broad immune-cell activity. It does not directly deplete B cells, T cells or plasma cells. Instead, it reduces the circulating level of IgG antibodies that have already been produced. This is why the effect can be relatively rapid and reversible.

Why IgG autoantibodies matter in autoimmune disease

Autoimmune diseases are not all the same. Some are mainly driven by T-cell inflammation, some by cytokines, some by immune-complex formation, and some by disease-causing autoantibodies. FcRn blockade is most relevant where IgG autoantibodies have a clear pathogenic role.

In IgG-mediated autoimmune disease, autoantibodies may bind to cell-surface receptors, structural proteins, platelets, red blood cells, skin adhesion proteins or other self-antigens. The clinical effect depends on the target. In some conditions the antibody blocks normal receptor function. In others it activates complement, marks cells for clearance, or causes inflammation at a tissue surface.

The important principle is that lowering pathogenic IgG may reduce the autoimmune signal while leaving other immune mechanisms more intact than with broad immunosuppression. Immunoglobulin A, immunoglobulin M and many cellular immune functions are not directly targeted by FcRn blockade, although clinical monitoring remains essential because IgG is an important part of infection defence.

Examples of FcRn-targeting medicines

Several FcRn-targeting treatments have been developed or are under clinical investigation. These include efgartigimod alfa, rozanolixizumab, nipocalimab and batoclimab. They differ in molecular structure, route of administration, dosing schedule, regulatory status and clinical development programme.

Efgartigimod alfa is an engineered human IgG1 Fc fragment designed to bind FcRn and reduce IgG recycling. Rozanolixizumab is a humanised monoclonal antibody directed against FcRn. Nipocalimab and batoclimab are FcRn-blocking monoclonal antibodies being studied across several IgG-mediated autoimmune conditions. Availability in the UK and Europe depends on the licensed indication, local commissioning, specialist assessment and individual patient suitability.

Important clinical point

FcRn blockade is not a general treatment for all autoimmune symptoms. It is a specialist treatment strategy considered when the disease mechanism, antibody profile, clinical severity, previous treatment response and safety profile support an IgG-lowering approach.

How quickly does FcRn blockade work?

Because FcRn blockade increases the breakdown of circulating IgG, it may reduce IgG levels more quickly than treatments that depend on slowly altering antibody production. The timing of clinical improvement varies between conditions and between patients. A fall in antibody level does not always translate immediately into symptom improvement because tissue inflammation, complement activation, organ damage or downstream immune pathways may take longer to settle.

The effect is also reversible. When treatment is stopped, FcRn function gradually resumes and IgG levels may recover over time. This reversibility can be clinically useful, but it also means that repeated or maintenance treatment may be required in some chronic relapsing conditions.

Is FcRn blockade immunosuppression?

FcRn blockade is best understood as targeted immunomodulation rather than broad immune suppression. It lowers IgG by increasing IgG catabolism. It does not directly suppress bone marrow function, does not directly deplete lymphocytes and does not act like high-dose corticosteroids or conventional cytotoxic immunosuppressants.

However, IgG is important for immune protection. Patients being considered for FcRn blockade require specialist assessment of infection history, vaccination status, current medicines, immunoglobulin levels, pregnancy status where relevant, co-existing medical conditions and the need for monitoring during treatment.

Safety considerations and monitoring

The safety profile depends on the specific medicine, the dose, the route of administration and the patient’s underlying condition. Reported adverse effects vary between products but may include headache, injection-site reactions, upper respiratory tract infections, nausea, diarrhoea, fever, rash or infusion-related symptoms. Because FcRn also participates in albumin homeostasis, some FcRn-targeting approaches may require attention to serum albumin, although the extent of albumin change differs between molecules.

Before treatment, clinicians may check full blood count, liver and kidney function, immunoglobulin levels, infection risk, vaccination history and disease-specific autoantibody markers. During treatment, monitoring may include symptom scores, clinical examination, infection surveillance, IgG levels where appropriate, treatment tolerance and review of concomitant medicines.

Patients should inform their clinician if they develop recurrent infections, persistent fever, new unexplained symptoms, severe headache, allergic-type symptoms, pregnancy, planned surgery, or if they are due to receive vaccines. Live vaccines and timing of vaccination should be discussed with the treating specialist.

How FcRn blockade differs from other antibody-lowering treatments

Plasma exchange can remove antibodies rapidly from the circulation, but it is a procedure-based treatment and may require vascular access. Intravenous immunoglobulin can modulate immune function through several mechanisms, including Fc receptor effects, complement modulation and anti-inflammatory signalling. B-cell targeted treatments reduce the formation of new antibody-producing immune responses but may take longer to affect established antibody levels and may have broader immune effects.

FcRn blockade occupies a different position. It is pharmacological rather than procedure-based, reduces IgG by accelerating its natural breakdown, and can be repeated according to the licensed product schedule and specialist treatment plan. It may be considered when the aim is to lower pathogenic IgG without using broad immune suppression, although it is not suitable for every patient or every autoimmune condition.

Who may benefit from specialist assessment?

A specialist immunology or relevant organ-specific specialist assessment may be appropriate for patients with suspected antibody-mediated autoimmune disease, especially where standard treatments have not provided adequate disease control, where corticosteroid exposure is problematic, or where there is a documented pathogenic IgG autoantibody associated with active disease.

Assessment should include confirmation of diagnosis, review of previous investigations, antibody testing, disease activity measurement, treatment history, infection history and discussion of the balance between potential benefit and risk. FcRn blockade should not be started purely because an autoantibody is present; the antibody must be interpreted in the full clinical context.

Patient information

This page is for general medical education. FcRn-blocking medicines are prescription-only specialist treatments. They should only be considered after diagnosis, antibody testing and clinical review by an appropriately experienced clinician.

Summary

FcRn is a natural recycling receptor that protects IgG antibodies from degradation. This mechanism is useful for normal immune protection but may also prolong the survival of pathogenic IgG autoantibodies in antibody-mediated autoimmune disease. FcRn blockade interrupts this recycling pathway, increases IgG breakdown and can reduce circulating pathogenic IgG without directly suppressing the whole immune system.

This is an important development in modern immunology because it offers a targeted way to address IgG-driven disease mechanisms. Its role depends on the specific condition, the antibody involved, the licensed indication, treatment availability and the patient’s overall clinical situation.

References

  1. Gjølberg TT, Andersen JT, Sandlie I. Targeting the neonatal Fc receptor in autoimmune diseases: pipeline and progress. BioDrugs. 2025.
  2. Zhu L, et al. FcRn inhibitors: transformative advances and significant potential in autoimmune diseases. Front Immunol. 2025.
  3. Yang CW, et al. Evaluating the clinical impact of FcRn inhibition in IgG-mediated autoimmune disease. Autoimmun Rev. 2025.
  4. Seth NP, et al. Nipocalimab, an immunoselective FcRn blocker that lowers IgG, including pathogenic autoantibodies. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2025.
  5. Nilforoushzadeh MA, et al. FcRn inhibitors in immune thrombocytopenia: a comprehensive review of therapeutic advances and clinical outcomes. Transfus Apher Sci. 2025.
  6. Yasuda M, et al. Opposing effects of efgartigimod and rozanolixizumab on serum albumin levels. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2026.
  7. European Medicines Agency. Vyvgart: efgartigimod alfa. European public assessment report.
  8. European Medicines Agency. Rystiggo: rozanolixizumab. European public assessment report.

Copyright 2026. All Rights Reserved

LAIC Main Menu